Wire

Remaining Big Country Members Tell Drummer: Stop Touring as ‘Big Country’

The “Big Country Drummer Must Stop Touring As Big Country” dispute escalated. Remaining members cited ‘historical inaccuracies’ and ‘general math’ in their legal filing.

Big Country Drummer Dispute - Remaining Big Country Members Tell Drummer: Stop Touring as 'Big Country'

LOS ANGELES— The ongoing saga of the Big Country Drummer Must Stop Touring As Big Country, Say Rest Of Big Country dispute reached a new peak this week. Remaining members of the iconic Scottish rock band issued a cease and desist order. They demanded drummer Mark Brzezicki immediately halt using the band’s name for his current touring outfit.

“This isn’t about ego,” stated Dr. Percival ‘Percy’ Fiddlewick, 78, a self-proclaimed ‘Historian of Rock & Roll Nomenclature’ and notary public. “It’s about arithmetic. One person cannot constitute an entire country, even a metaphorical one. It defies the very spirit of cartography, let alone band composition.”

A Nation of One?

Brzezicki has toured under the Big Country name for several years. He performed classic hits like “In A Big Country.” His legal team argued that as a long-standing member, he retains rights to the moniker. They cited various precedents involving bands with revolving lineups. A detailed history of bands changing their names was submitted as evidence. This included examples where one member carried on the legacy.

“We simply desire accuracy for our loyal fanbase,” explained Reginald ‘Reggie’ McTavish, 63, the sole remaining founding guitarist and official ‘Custodian of Big Country’s Legacy.’ “When people buy a ticket for Big Country, they expect a certain bigness. Mark, bless his heart, is a single man. He cannot replicate the sprawling, anthemic soundscape that defines us. It’s like calling a single grain of sand ‘The Sahara Desert’.”

Defining ‘Big’

The “rest of Big Country” currently consists of McTavish and a rotating cast of session musicians. They perform under the name ‘Big Country: The Original Spirit.’ They clarified their dispute. It was not against Brzezicki’s drumming. It was against his expansive interpretation of the word ‘Big.’ They pointed to the original hit, “In A Big Country,” as proof of their collective vision.

Legal experts suggested the case could redefine intellectual property rights for aging bands. It might set a precedent for quantifying ‘bigness’ in musical ensembles. The court may need to appoint a “Bigness Arbiter.”

At press time, Brzezicki announced his next tour would be as “Medium-Sized Municipality.”

Rate the joke

Related nonsense

More Music →