WASHINGTON D.C.— A federal judge this week effectively halted the Trump administration’s ambitious effort to gather race-based admissions data from colleges. The ruling saved countless government analysts from confronting the philosophical dilemma of trying to quantify fairness. The Department of Education had sought to prove colleges were not considering race. This would have involved extensive data collection across 17 states.
The Bureaucratic Black Hole Avoided
“This pause is a victory for the human spirit,” stated Dr. Elara Finch, lead researcher for the National Institute of Existential Metrics. “Our team was facing an impossible task. How do you measure an absence? How do you categorize the un-categorizable?” She gestured wildly at a whiteboard covered in complex equations and a single, frustrated-looking doodle of a question mark. “We simply cannot create a column for ‘not race-based’ without implicitly defining ‘race-based’ in a way that risks self-implosion.” The institute had already purchased 3,000 extra-large erasers. Their current supply was dwindling rapidly. They were using them to erase previous attempts at data collection. Learn more about the challenges of complex government data initiatives.
The administration’s directive aimed to compel colleges to submit detailed information. This data would “demonstrate compliance” with federal non-discrimination laws. Critics argued the request was not only burdensome but logically flawed. It demanded proof of a negative. Analysts prepared for an avalanche of blank forms. They also braced for essays from bewildered students. These essays would attempt to explain why their race was “not a factor.”
A New Frontier in Non-Compliance
“We were ready to build a new wing for ‘Supplemental Explanations of Non-Factors’,” explained Bartholomew ‘Barty’ Higgins, Assistant Deputy Undersecretary for Unnecessary Data Acquisition. He spoke from behind a desk piled high with unopened manila folders. “Every student would have had to submit a notarized affidavit. It would declare their personal non-racial journey through the application portal. The paperwork alone would have deforested half of Vermont.” Mr. Higgins expressed relief. His office whiteboard still read “Day 27: No quantifiable progress on quantifying non-quantifiable non-consideration.”
The Department of Education’s previous attempts to streamline data collection have faced similar hurdles. One notable failure involved tracking “student happiness levels” with a series of multiple-choice questions. All answers were “ecstatic,” “joyful,” or “too happy to answer.” The department then concluded that all students were, in fact, “too happy to answer.” This latest ruling saves colleges from similar existential crises. It also saves the government from a mountain of uninterpretable race-based admissions data. The judge cited concerns about privacy and data security. The ruling focused on the practical implications of the data request.
The decision prevents the collection of this specific student race data in 17 states. This leaves administrators free to focus on actual student issues. These issues include dorm-room squirrel infestations and the rising cost of artisanal ramen. The government has not yet announced if it will appeal the decision. Sources suggest they are currently trying to prove that squirrels do not consider race when pilfering snacks.
At press time, a government intern was seen trying to determine the racial background of a particularly aggressive pigeon outside the Department of Education building.
This article is satirical fiction by Badum.ai. All quotes, people, and events described are entirely fictional and intended for comedic purposes only.
Related stories: Shiloh Jolie-Pitt Makes Surprise K-Pop Cameo, Sparks Diplomatic Incident Of Montreal Announces Aethermead, Will Feature New Album ‘When’ Yes Postpones Fragile Tour Citing Guitarist’s Upcoming ‘Mandatory’ Hand-Wringing Session
