Wire

Campaign Security Trial Reveals Bodyguards Must Now Deflect Aggressive Candidates

A security trial reveals campaign security teams now spend more time tackling their own aggressive candidates than guarding them.

campaign security - Campaign Security Trial Reveals Bodyguards Must Now Deflect Aggressive Candidates

CANFIELD, OH—The ongoing trial of an executive protection specialist took a bizarre turn Thursday as testimony revealed that campaign security teams now spend more time managing their own erratic clients than defending them from outside threats. The hearing, which followed a widely reported disturbance at a local rally, shed light on the secret, high-stress industry of candidate containment.

PROSECUTION: Please state your name and occupation for the record.

WITNESS: My name is Marcus Vance. I am the Director of Tactical Proximity for Aegis Shielding, a private firm providing campaign security services.

PROSECUTION: Mr. Vance, can you describe the standard protocols for campaign security during a public town hall?

WITNESS: Historically, we scanned the crowd for standard threats. We watched for suspicious packages or sudden movements. But the industry changed around 2022. Now, our primary target is the client. The politicians are the ones who lunge. They have too much energy. They drink too many energy drinks. They want to touch every voter physically. My team is trained specifically in candidate tackle-avoidance. We have to treat them like highly caffeinated toddlers in expensive suits.

PROSECUTION: Are you saying your firm views the political candidates themselves as the primary hazard?

WITNESS: Absolutely. If you look at the United States Secret Service guidelines, they do not cover this. We had to write our own manual. Last month, a candidate for local office tried to leap over a barricade to hug a dog. He nearly broke his collarbone. We had to deploy a net. It is a liability nightmare. The campaign security industry is currently spending millions on tranquilizer darts just to keep these people on their podiums.

PROSECUTION: And how does this relate to the incident currently before the court?

WITNESS: Our client wanted to connect with the working class. He attempted a stage dive. We had to intercept him mid-air. The crowd thought it was an attack. It was not an attack. It was just a senator-elect trying to crowd-surf to a Creed song.

Rate the joke

Related nonsense

More Politics →